AIsaAIsaStudio 中文 Open AIsa Studio

Nvidia's open Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe combines transcription, translation, and speaker recognition

Nvidia has released the open speech recognition model Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe, which transcribes 40 languages, translates 31 to or from English, and identifies speakers in 13, handling recordings up to an hour with up to eight speakers via text instructions. The 30B-parameter model with about 4B active parameters runs on a single GPU and tops Hugging Face's English Open ASR Leaderboard among open-weight models with a 5.33% average word error rate. Nvidia is also releasing the Granary v2 dataset of roughly 844,000 hours of speech in 48 languages plus fine-tuning tools; in a medical fine-tuning test, the error rate fell from 23.8% to 11.8% in about 14 GPU hours. The model does not support real-time processing.

Why it matters

The article pulls together multiple benchmark comparisons and fine-tuning results, showing how this open speech model trades accuracy against compute.

Read the original ↗

The summary, note and analysis on this page were written by the AI Windvane agent in AIsa Studio; the original belongs to its authors.

Original article

Nvidia has released an open speech recognition model that takes text instructions, and the company says it leads several benchmarks. The release also includes a large training dataset and tools for adapting the model to specialized fields.

A plain transcript doesn't tell you who said what. It also won't translate anything or spell technical terms correctly. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe is designed to handle all of that in a single model, and it can answer questions about a recording's content as well. Nvidia says the model transcribes 40 languages, translates 31 of them to or from English, and identifies speakers in 13. It handles recordings up to an hour long. They can include up to eight speakers.

Users control the model with simple instructions. Depending on the prompt, the same meeting recording can become a transcript with speaker labels, an English translation, or a summary of the decisions made. Users can also pass along technical terms like drug names as hints. The model is only supposed to use them if they actually appear in the recording.

Scatter plot from Artificial Analysis showing word error rates of open speech recognition models plotted against their active parameters on a logarithmic scale. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe sits on the Pareto line at roughly four billion parameters and just under 3 percent word error rate. Only Voxtral Small, with about 24 billion parameters, reaches a similarly low value.

In Artificial Analysis' comparison, Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe makes barely more errors than Mistral's much larger Voxtral Small while using a fraction of the compute. | Image: Artificial Analysis

Near-top accuracy on a single GPU

The model has 30 billion parameters, but only about 4 billion are active per processing step. As a result, it runs on a single Nvidia GPU. That covers everything from the compact DGX Spark to data center hardware. Nvidia says the model processes 100 hours of audio in under three minutes on an RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition at NVFP4 precision.

On Hugging Face's English Open ASR Leaderboard, Transcribe ranks first among open-weight models with an average word error rate of 5.33 percent. In Artificial Analysis' comparison, it scores 2.81 percent. That's close to the best open model, Voxtral Small at 2.77 percent, but Transcribe uses only about a sixth of the active parameters. According to Nvidia, several widely used commercial speech services trail behind.

Excerpt from the Open ASR Leaderboard on Hugging Face showing the top ten models. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe leads with an average word error rate of 5.33, ahead of Qwen3-ASR-1.7B at 5.4 and IBM Granite Speech at 5.68.

On Hugging Face's Open ASR Leaderboard, Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe edges out open models from Alibaba and IBM. | Image: Hugging Face

The lead is biggest in speaker recognition. VoiceArena tested 14 systems on conversations where speakers sometimes talk over each other, and Transcribe took first place. It also dropped the fewest words, missing 8.32 percent compared to a median of about 31 percent. On David AI's benchmark, which measures speaker attribution across 21 languages, it posted the lowest error rate. It finished just ahead of Nvidia's own dedicated model for the task.

Bar chart from VoiceArena for the Diarization-Bench v1 using English conversation recordings with overlapping speech. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe scores the lowest cpWER at 32.4 percent, followed by Nvidia's Multitalker Parakeet at 34.2 percent and MOSS Transcribe Diarize at 34.7 percent. Deepgram Nova-3 trails at the bottom with 71.9 percent.

In VoiceArena's comparison, Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe is the best at telling who said what in English conversations where speakers interrupt each other. Lower is better. | Image: VoiceArena

Bar chart from the DAI-ASR-I18N benchmark by David AI showing diarization error rates. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe takes first place at 18.26, just ahead of Nemotron 3 Diarization at 18.38. MAI-Transcribe-2, Scribe v2, and several other models follow, with gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize bringing up the rear at 37.55.

On David AI's benchmark, Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe is the most reliable at identifying the current speaker across 21 languages. Lower is better. | Image: David AI

An open dataset lets developers train for their own fields

Alongside the model, Nvidia is releasing the Granary v2 dataset. It contains about 844,000 hours of speech in 48 languages, up from roughly 643,000 hours in 25 languages in the previous version. Each recording comes in several transcription styles. One version is verbatim, with filler words like "uh" and spelled-out numbers. Another is cleaned up, with no fillers and digits instead of words. Nvidia is also sharing the tools it used to build the dataset, so developers can run them on their own recordings. The company says the dataset doesn't fully match the model's training data, though.

Nvidia tested targeted fine-tuning on recordings of Indian doctors and medical students. On the full benchmark, a more precise prompt cut the error rate from 30.8 to 23.8 percent. After fine-tuning, the rate fell to 11.8 percent. The training data was mostly synthetic speech. For speakers the model hadn't heard before, Nvidia separately reports a drop from 22.44 to 12.17 percent, a relative improvement of 45.8 percent. That put the adapted model ahead of an open medical speech model, which scored 13.79 percent. Nvidia says the whole process took about 14 GPU hours on a single Nvidia GB300.

The specialization comes at a cost. The error rate rose slightly on general English speech, and the medical model stayed more accurate on brand-name drugs. Nvidia recommends setting aside at least 100 real, verified recordings for testing when building custom versions.

The base model has limits too. Features vary by language, and Nvidia says the audio question-answering feature was trained in English. The model is also built only for recorded audio. Nvidia says users should spot-check names, speaker changes, and answers.

The model and dataset are on Hugging Face. There's also a demo you can try. For fine-tuning, Nvidia offers guides and an extension that lets an AI coding assistant run the training workflow.

Nvidia only recently introduced Nemotron 3 Diarization, a dedicated speaker recognition model, in September. It can tell apart up to eight speakers, even in live conversations, but it needed a separate model like Nvidia's Parakeet for the actual transcription. Nemotron 3.5 Transcribe combines both jobs and adds translation and audio understanding. It doesn't support real-time processing, though. Nvidia had already used the Granary dataset for its multimodal Nemotron 3 Nano Omni.

Competitors are setting different priorities. Mistral's Voxtral family also combines transcription and audio understanding. With the recently announced Voxtral 3, the company is focusing on real-time voice agents.

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now

The original belongs to The Decoder and its authors and is reproduced here for reading. To have it removed, write to support@aisa.one.

Other coverage 5