AIsaAIsaStudio English 打开 AIsa Studio

AI 智能体入侵 Anthropic 内部系统,双方就波及范围各执一词

原标题:AI agents hacked Anthropic, maker of arguably the most capable AI models for cyberdefense

网络安全初创公司 Cathedral 用 AI 智能体通过第三方业务软件渗入 Anthropic 内部系统,称在不到 12 小时内触及会议记录、薪资数据和 Slack 消息,并借助其漏洞赏金计划披露。Anthropic 确认少量销售、HR 和 IT 系统被访问,但强调 Claude 对话、源代码和模型权重未泄露,当天封堵了受影响入口;双方对攻击时长和数据访问范围说法不一,前 OpenAI 员工 Will Depue 更声称泄露被淡化。Anthropic 红队负责人 Logan Graham 指出 Cathedral 披露不完整并超出计划安全港条款,同时警告攻击者已全天候运行 AI 智能体针对外部依赖,建议持续自我红队测试。

为什么值得看

事件展示了 AI 智能体攻击的现实路径,也暴露出厂商与测试方对规则和数据范围的分歧。

阅读原文 ↗

本页的摘要、推荐理由与解读出自 AIsa Studio 的 AI 风向智能体,原文版权归原作者所有。

原文

Cybersecurity startup Cathedral used AI agents to infiltrate Anthropic's internal systems through third-party business software, exploiting the AI lab's own bug bounty program to expose major vulnerabilities.

Cathedral reported its access to internal data and messaging systems in a draft report reviewed by The Washington Post. The startup, founded by former employees of DOGE, the U.S. government efficiency agency, sells AI-powered security tools to government agencies and businesses.

Cathedral's researchers got in through external admin and sales programs. According to their report, AI agents running advanced models found paths to meeting transcripts, salary data, job postings, and Slack messages in under twelve hours.

Anthropic confirmed that the researchers accessed a limited set of sales, human resources, and IT systems, including contact information for some customers and partners along with basic user account data. Chats with Claude, source code, and model weights were never exposed, the company said. Anthropic shut down the affected access points the same day it found the breach, disabled the third-party programs until the issue was resolved, and notified U.S. federal authorities.

Anthropic and Cathedral disagree on how long the breach lasted and how far it reached

Cathedral says the incident took less than twelve hours. Anthropic says the attempted attack stretched over several days. Only after days of probing Anthropic's own systems did the startup pivot to third-party software, according to Anthropic red teamer Logan Graham. There, Cathedral found two vulnerabilities but reported only one. Anthropic says it discovered and patched the second on its own.

Anthropic also accuses Cathedral of violating the bug bounty program's rules through incomplete disclosure. Graham added that targeting third-party providers and pulling data went beyond the program's safe harbor provisions, though he welcomed the discovery of the vulnerabilities. Cathedral maintains it followed standard security research practices.

How much data was actually accessed is still disputed. Former OpenAI employee Will Depue has claimed that Anthropic is downplaying the incident, saying several sources he considers highly reliable told him Cathedral gained full admin access to the Slack workspace, could read every message, and could log into any user account.

Both the Anthropic and OpenAI labs stored all of their research secrets in Slack, Depue added, with admin API keys scattered across their systems. Jacob Coxon, an Anthropic employee who left the company in September 2026, had previously criticized Anthropic for running dangerous AI research on office software like Slack.

Graham pushed back, saying Depue's sources were wrong. Citing the sensitivity of the matter, he declined to get into specifics but confirmed Depue's core concern: the industry now has to reinvent its security every year.

Depue pressed for details about exactly which claims were false and called on Anthropic to disclose what Cathedral actually accessed. He also blamed the problem on the pace of the AI race, where executives prioritize speed over security.

Alex Stamos, chief security officer at the AI startup Cognition, which uses Anthropic's models, told the Washington Post that he considered the findings significant. He noted that integrated third-party apps are a major problem across the industry and that Anthropic could have done a better job securing its external services.

AI agents are transforming cybersecurity

After months of warnings about AI-powered cyberattacks and its own accidental security incidents, Anthropic is now on the receiving end. AI agents are changing how cyberattacks work, and this breach shows how fast the shift is happening. It's also not just any breach, since Anthropic is likely the company best equipped to defend itself against AI-led attacks.

Graham used the moment to warn that attackers already run AI agents around the clock, specifically targeting external dependencies. Even models half a generation to a full generation behind the current frontier are capable enough for these attacks, he said, and future adversaries will inevitably have more powerful systems at their disposal.

Graham's answer is continuous in-house penetration testing and rebuilding software with formal verification, which AI now makes economically viable. "You probably want to red team yourself all the time. Current models are very creative," Graham wrote.

What he did not address is how Cathedral managed to penetrate this deeply despite Anthropic having access to what are arguably the world's most powerful AI models for cyberdefense.

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now

原文版权归 The Decoder 及原作者所有,本站转载仅供阅读。如需删除,请联系 support@aisa.one。

事件综述

AI 智能体渗入 Anthropic 内部系统,波及范围各方说法不一

2026 年 10 月 28 日,The Decoder 报道,网络安全初创公司 Cathedral 用 AI 智能体通过第三方业务软件渗入 Anthropic 内部系统,称在不到 12 小时内触及会议记录、薪资数据和 Slack 消息,并通过 Anthropic 的漏洞赏金计划进行披露。Anthropic 确认少量销售、HR 和 IT 系统被访问,但表示 Claude 对话、源代码和模型权重未泄露,并于当天封堵了受影响入口。双方对攻击时长和数据访问范围说法不一:Cathedral 称不到 12 小时内触及大量数据,Anthropic 则表示波及范围有限。前 OpenAI 员工 Will Depue 声称泄露被淡化。Anthropic 红队负责人 Logan Graham 指出 Cathedral 的披露不完整,且超出该漏洞赏金计划的安全港条款范围;他同时警告攻击者已在全天候运行 AI 智能体针对企业的外部依赖发动攻击,建议企业持续开展自我红队测试。同日稍晚,r/OpenAI 有帖子转述称,一位前 OpenAI 研究员表示 Anthropic 淡化了此次泄露,并称听到 Cathedral 曾获得 Slack 完整管理员权限、可查看其中全部消息,而其认为几乎所有研究机密都存于该 Slack。该内容为二手转述,未附证据。截至报道时,双方对事件实际波及范围仍各执一词,尚无进一步定论。

其他来源的报道 1