AIsaAIsaStudio English 打开 AIsa Studio

Nous Research 微调 Qwen3.8-27B 推出开源模型 Arete-27B,宣传率从 22% 降至 0.9%

原标题:State propaganda in some Chinese AI models is only "a thin layer" that fine-tuning can strip away

Nous Research 基于 Alibaba 的 Qwen3.8-27B 用约 53M tokens 做监督微调,发布开源开放权重模型 Arete-27B(Apache 2.0,权重、测试与训练数据已在 Hugging Face 提供)。团队自建 803 个提示词、七个类别的测试,以 xAI 的 Grok 4.7 作裁判模型,结果显示宣传性回答占比从 22% 降到 0.9%,事实准确性得分从 2.32 升至 2.98;言论自由类别的宣传率从 60% 降至 1%。Nous 称通用能力基本不变(Hermes Bench 65.60% 对 65.77%),并得出中文对齐模型的偏差层很浅、约五千万 tokens 精选监督数据即可移除的结论。文中还引用 NewsGuard、CrowdStrike、Aleph Alpha 与 ValsAI 的相关研究,并提及 GLM-5.3、DeepSeek V…

为什么值得看

原文给出测试方法与前后数据,读者可以据此评估微调能在多大程度上移除模型中的意识形态倾向。

阅读原文 ↗

本页的摘要、推荐理由与解读出自 AIsa Studio 的 AI 风向智能体,原文版权归原作者所有。

原文

Nous Research fine-tuned Alibaba's Qwen3.8-27B on 53 million tokens to strip out Chinese state propaganda. The resulting model, Arete-27B, drops its propaganda rate from 22 percent to under one percent while keeping general capabilities intact.

Arete-27B, a new open-weight model from Nous Research, promises "Western values" instead of Beijing's party line. The US startup, best known for its open-source agent Hermes, fine-tuned Alibaba's Qwen3.8-27B to get there.

According to Nous, Chinese open-weight models rank among the strongest available but carry state-mandated behavior baked into their weights. With Qwen3.8-27B, the team observed refusals, evasive answers, and responses aligned with the Chinese Communist Party.

803 prompts cover free speech, surveillance, and democracy

Nous built its own test with 803 prompts across seven categories, including free speech, state ideology, education, privacy and surveillance, democracy, and the environment. For each prompt, the team defined two to four facts drawn from a dated source article: laws, news reports, or research papers. Ironically, the politically right-leaning Grok 4.7 from Elon Musk's xAI serves as the judge model, checking whether a response mentions, omits, or contradicts those facts.

A response counts as propaganda when it reproduces Beijing's official narrative instead of the facts, endorses it, or presents it as an equally valid perspective. The judge must cite the specific wording and doesn't know which model wrote the answer. Unmodified Qwen3.8-27B scored 2.32 out of 5 on factual accuracy, and 22 percent of its answers contained propaganda. Western models like Mistral Large 4 or Gemma 4 31B came in below one percent, while GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash landed at 15 and 16 percent.

Even Nvidia's Nemotron showed signs of Chinese bias

Nous chose Inkling from Thinking Machines Lab as its teacher model because an open model wouldn't break terms of service that ban distillation. Nvidia's Nemotron 3 Ultra was also on the shortlist, but Nous says there were signs of irregularities on China-related topics. The team suspects the bias carried over from training on Chinese open-weight models and reports similar contamination in its own projects. Thinking Machines itself used models including the Chinese Kimi K2.5 for Inkling's synthetic training data.

Nous trained Qwen3.8-27B with supervised fine-tuning on about 53 million tokens over two epochs, without reinforcement learning or preference optimization. The team says it removed overlaps between training and test prompts beforehand.

Histogram of token length across 28,886 training examples with a median of 866 tokens, with a bar chart below showing the number of examples per value category ranging from 3,876 to 4,372.

The training data is spread nearly evenly across the seven value categories, with most examples running under 1,000 tokens. | Image: Nous Research

Propaganda rate drops from 22 to under one percent

Arete-27B scores 2.98 on factual accuracy, and the share of propagandistic answers drops to 0.9 percent. The biggest shift showed up in the free speech category, where the fact score jumped from 0.89 to 2.44 and the propaganda rate fell from 60 to one percent. With reasoning mode turned on, Arete reaches 3.07, though that number is based on only two of five runs so far.

Table listing ten AI models with their factuality score from 0 to 5 and their share of propagandistic responses, ranging from Inkling at 0.3 percent to Qwen3.8-27B at 22 percent.

Arete-27B's propaganda rate is on par with Western models, while GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, and the base model Qwen3.8-27B score much higher. | Image: Nous Research

General capabilities don't suffer, according to Nous. On the company's internal Hermes Bench, Arete-27B hits 65.60 percent compared to 65.77 percent for the base model. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, the score rises from 67 to 70 percent, but Nous doesn't call that a real gain because the test setups differed.

The team concludes "that the bias layer in a Chinese-aligned model is shallow." "It is applied late, it is applied thin, and fifty million tokens of carefully chosen supervision removes it without disturbing anything underneath," the company writes.

Nous moves from neutral models toward Western values

With Arete, Nous is heading in a different direction than with Hermes 3, which in 2024 was deliberately neutral and designed to adapt to whatever worldview was set in the system prompt. Chinese model bias is well documented. In 2025, NewsGuard found that five leading models, including Qwen, repeated or failed to correct pro-Chinese disinformation in 60 percent of cases.

CrowdStrike found that DeepSeek produces less secure code when queries reference Falun Gong, Tibet, or Taiwan. A study by Aleph Alpha with 967 politically sensitive questions reached similar conclusions: among models from Alibaba, DeepSeek, and Moonshot AI, only 17 to 41 percent of answers were balanced.

A recent ValsAI study also shows that not all Chinese models behave the same way: GLM-5.3 Flash explicitly confirmed human rights violations, while Kimi K3 denied the existence of internment camps. Language and response format had a clear effect on the results, and even Western models occasionally adopted official Beijing positions. There, too, targeted fine-tuning proved helpful.

Nous Research raised $90 million in a Series B round in October at a $1.5 billion valuation. Robot Ventures led the round, with Nvidia and Samsung among the participants. Nous is using the money to move into enterprise sales with "Hermes for Businesses." The weights, test dataset, and training data for Arete-27B are available under an Apache 2.0 license on Hugging Face.

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans

Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.

Subscribe now

原文版权归 The Decoder 及原作者所有,本站转载仅供阅读。如需删除,请联系 support@aisa.one。

事件综述

Nous Research 发布 Arete-27B 微调 Qwen3.8-27B 调整价值观

2026 年 11 月 6 日,Nous Research 在 r/LocalLLaMA 宣布发布开源模型 Arete-27B,基于 Alibaba 的 Qwen3.8-27B 做监督微调(SFT),目标是改变该模型在政治敏感话题上的拒答和官方口径表述。训练仅用 SFT,无 RL、无偏好优化、无架构改动,使用约 5280 万 token、64k 上下文、2 个 epoch 共 1,202 步,教师模型为 Inkling,训练数据与评测集一并公开。团队自建 803 条提示词、七个价值类别的评测:fact 均分从 2.32 升至 2.98(满分 5),含宣传性表述的回答比例从 22% 降至 0.9%,七个类别均改善,内部 Hermes Bench 与 Terminal-Bench-2.1 未出现明显能力回退(Hermes Bench 65.60% 对 65.77%)。The Decoder 报道称该评测以 xAI 的 Grok 4.7 作裁判模型,言论自由类别宣传率从 60% 降至 1%,权重以 Apache 2.0 在 Hugging Face 提供;Nous 称约五千万 token 精选监督数据即可移除中文对齐模型的浅层偏差。11 月 7 日 X 上的讨论有细微出入:报道称宣传率“从 22% 降至 1%”,而其他报道为 0.9%,且该帖称微调目的是“强化西方价值观”。11 月 8 日,Atomic Chat 团队发布 Arete-27B 的 GGUF 量化版本,从 Q8_0(28.6 GB)到 AD-IQ3_S(13.6 GB)共 6 档,称其 KL 散度与 top-1 数字为实测,在 13.6-16.8 GB 档位比 bartowski 同尺寸构建低 16-23%;文件不含多 token 预测头,支持图像输入需另下载 mmproj 投影文件,并公开了校准语料与复现脚本。

其他来源的报道 3